Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot feasibility study shows inadequate diagnostic accuracy in novice raters after brief training, suggesting improved training requirements.
OBJECTIVE: To pilot the feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and repeatability of the Takano NBI-based IPCL classification when applied by novice raters after short formal training. METHODS: Ten dental students classified 90 oral lesions shown as paired white-light and NBI images in two sessions, 4 weeks apart. Scores were recorded on an ordinal scale (0-4), where category 0 denoted hyperplasia or clinically normal mucosa, while categories 1-4 represented increasing degrees of epithelial dysplasia or invasive disease. Histopathology served as the reference standard. RESULTS: The 90 lesions comprised 38 hyperplastic/normal, 29 dysplastic, and 23 invasive carcinomas. Mean agreement with histology was 18.8% at T1 and 21.0% at T2, with weighted kappa values of 0.080 and 0.093, respectively. Agreement with the expert rater was 22.2% at T1 and 20.4% at T2, with weighted kappa values of 0.170 and 0.127. CONCLUSION: A short lecture-based training is insufficient for reliable NBI interpretation by novice raters. These findings support the necessity for structured, competency-based training and supervised case libraries before Takano-based NBI assessment can be recommended in clinical practice for inexperienced practitioners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zotti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: