Key result
New protocol explores practice patterns and reasoning for phenylephrine versus norepinephrine selection during non-cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
Vasopressor choices to treat intraoperative hypotension, specifically phenylephrine versus norepinephrine, are debated, and studies are needed to determine the most appropriate therapy given variable clinical use.
What are the practice patterns and reasoning behind anaesthesia providers' choice of vasopressors (phenylephrine vs norepinephrine) during non-cardiac surgery?
What are the practice patterns and reasoning behind anaesthesia providers' choice of vasopressors (phenylephrine vs norepinephrine) during non-cardiac surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This protocol outlines a mixed-methods study to understand practice patterns and reasoning for vasopressor selection during non-cardiac surgery, informing a future pragmatic clinical trial.
Background The deleterious effect of intraoperative hypotension has been emphasised by many observational studies. However, vasopressor therapies to treat intraoperative hypotension, specifically the choice between phenylephrine and norepinephrine, have been debated. There is a crucial need for additional studies to determine the most appropriate choice for vasopressor therapy in the context of this variable use. Methods and analysis A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design is proposed to expand the knowledge base relating to vasopressor selection during non-cardiac surgery and inform the education surrounding and extrapolation of the results of a pragmatic clinical trial. The three phases will consist of an observational study using rigorously validated multicentre electronic health record data, a web-based survey targeting clinicians and a semistructured interview targeting a subsample of survey respondents. These research aims will address areas with insufficient data: (1) the quantification of practice patterns and variation of vasopressor selection within non-cardiac operating rooms and (2) the reasoning behind these clinical decisions. This study will serve as primary steps to develop and provide context for the future results of a multicentre pragmatic clinical trial comparing the impact of phenylephrine and norepinephrine on postoperative patient outcomes. Ethics and dissemination This study has received Institutional Review Board (IRB) exemption from the University of Michigan. We plan to disseminate results through peer-reviewed journal articles, conference proceedings and presentations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janda et al. (2026) studied Intraoperative hypotension during non-cardiac surgery. Phenylephrine vs. Norepinephrine was evaluated on Practice patterns and variation of vasopressor selection and reasoning behind clinical decisions. This protocol outlines a multicentre mixed-methods study to quantify practice patterns and reasoning for vasopressor selection (phenylephrine vs norepinephrine) during non-cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: