Retrospective analysis explores endplate coverage's effect on heterotopic ossification post cervical disc replacement, suggesting actionable thresholds.
Study Design: Retrospective radiographic analysis of patients undergoing cervical disc replacement (CDR). Objective: To assess the impact of anteroposterior endplate coverage on the development, location, and severity of heterotopic ossification (HO) following CDR, and to establish clinically actionable coverage thresholds. Summary of Background Data: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication following CDR that may limit the range of motion. While endplate coverage has been implicated as a risk factor, the direction-specific relationship between undercoverage location and HO location, as well as dose-response thresholds, remains poorly defined. Methods: Patients undergoing CDR (2015–2024) with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up were retrospectively assessed (221 levels). Implant-to-endplate depth ratio (ID: ED) and exposed endplate ratio (EER) were measured on the first postoperative radiographs. HO was graded on final radiographs using the McAfee classification (0–4). Dose-response, direction-matched correlations, and ROC analyses were performed. Results: Heterotopic ossification (HO) was present in 85.8% of levels, with 42.7% developing severe HO (grade 3–4). Posterior HO was more common than anterior (84.3% vs. 41.3%, P <0.001). ID: ED correlated inversely with HO grade at both endplates ( P <0.001). Dose-response analysis demonstrated that severe HO rates increased from 22.2% ( Q 1) to 57.9% ( Q 4; RR =2.61, P <0.0001). Direction-matched analysis confirmed anterior undercoverage predicted anterior HO ( r =0.422, P <0.0001) and posterior undercoverage predicted posterior HO ( r =0.300, P <0.0001). ROC analysis identified an ID: ED ≤0.850 as the optimal threshold (AUC=0.668, P <0.001). Conclusions: Heterotopic ossification (HO) following CDR is strongly associated with inadequate endplate coverage. A direction-specific relationship exists whereby undercoverage location predicts HO location. Maintaining ID>85% and EER <15% may help limit severe HO risk. Level of Evidence: Level III—prognostic study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazarian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: