Why the study?
Does smoking improve acute phase outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents and clopidogrel?
Does smoking improve acute phase outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents and clopidogrel?
The apparent 'smoker's paradox' of better acute outcomes after myocardial infarction is explained by differences in baseline characteristics rather than a true protective effect of smoking.
Smoking shows no independent benefit after adjustment in acute MI; supports confounding by baseline factors rather than true protection.
Objectives Previous studies have found an apparent paradox in smokers: acute phase outcomes after an acute myocardial infarction are superior to those of nonsmokers. Furthermore, it is reported that smoking has an impact on the metabolism of clopidogrel. This study aimed to examine whether this paradoxical finding exists in patients who undergo drug-eluting stent implantation and are treated with clopidogrel. Methods From April 2003 to June 2010, 1424 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent and clopidogrel were enrolled. They were divided into three groups: current smokers (n=486); previous smokers (n=349); and nonsmokers (n=589). The primary end point was a composite of 30-day, all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or definite stent thrombosis. Results Compared with nonsmokers, current smokers were younger (P<0.001) and more often men (P<0.001). They had larger myocardial infarctions than did nonsmokers [maximum troponin I, 8.9 (2.4, 38.4) vs. 6.8 (1.4, 30.1) ng/ml, P=0.01]. Current smokers less frequently met the primary end point than did nonsmokers (2.9 vs. 6.1%, P=0.01). However, after adjustment for baseline and angiographic characteristics, the beneficial effect of smoking was no longer seen (odds ratio 1.35, confidence interval: 0.53–3.44, P=0.5). Conclusion A beneficial effect of smoking (‘smoker's paradox’) in the unadjusted primary end point continues to be present; however, after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics, no benefit was detectable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wakabayashi et al. (2011) studied this question.