Demonstrates first-generation H1 antagonists impair motor functions in mice, suggesting implications for patient safety and quality of life.
Histamine H1 receptor (H1R) antagonists are widely used to treat allergic reactions; however, their effects on the central nervous system can impair motor functions. This study investigated the impact of first-generation (diphenhydramine and d -chlorpheniramine) and second-generation (epinastine, ketotifen, bepotastine, and levocetirizine) H1R antagonists on motor functions in mice using activity wheel, balance beam, inclined screen, and rotarod tests. First-generation H1R antagonists significantly impaired motor functions, with diphenhydramine exerting stronger effects than those of d -chlorpheniramine. Among the second-generation agents, bepotastine and levocetirizine had minimal effects on all motor functions, whereas epinastine and ketotifen suppressed spontaneous movement, similar to first-generation H1R antagonists but had little effects on balance, postural stability, and coordinated movement. These findings provide valuable insights into the differential effects of first- and second-generation H1R antagonists on motor functions. These results highlight the importance of understanding individual profiles of H1R antagonists to minimize adverse effects, ensure patient safety, and improve quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taguchi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: