Prospective observational study finds enhanced diagnostic accuracy for cerebral venous thrombosis in emergency department settings.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a clinical scoring system, both aloneand in combination with D-dimer assay, for suspected cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in the emergencydepartment.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Emergency Department of a tertiary careteaching hospital in India. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were assessed using a CVT scoring system.They underwent non-contrast computed tomogography of the brain to rule out other types of strokes and todetect signs of CVT. D-dimer testing was also performed. The diagnosis of CVT was subsequently confirmedby magnetic resonance venography (MRV).Results: Among the75 study subjects, the frequency of CVT, as confirmed by MRV, was 53.33%. ElevatedD-dimer levels were observed in 32 out of 75 patients, of whom 26 (65%) patients had CVT. A low-probabilityclinical score demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.33% and a pecificity of 71.1% for ruling out CVT. When alow-probability score was combined with D-dimer values below 500 μg/L, the sensitivity for ruling out CVTimproved to 92.5%.Conclusion: The present study indicated that moderate- and high-probability clinical scores were associatedwith a higher likelihood of CVT. In this cohort, a low-probability clinical score combined with a negativeD-dimer assay had a high negative predictive value for CVT. While a moderate or high-probability scorewarranted urgent imaging, it could not confirm the diagnosis on its own. This approach is particularly useful inresource-limited settings for triaging and referring patients for the early initiation of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ranjan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: