Exchange rate volatility has intensified in recent decades, yet its systematic implications for banking-sector stability remain contested. This study investigates whether exchange rate volatility constitutes a meaningful source of financial fragility using a global panel of 103 countries over the period 2000–2021. Financial stability is proxied by the banking-sector Z-score, while exchange rate volatility is estimated using a EGARCH-based framework to capture time-varying uncertainty. To address cross-sectional dependence, heterogeneity, and endogeneity, the analysis employs Driscoll–Kraay fixed effects, two-step system GMM, and quantile regressions. The results reveal that exchange rate volatility exerts a statistically and economically significant negative effect on banking stability, reducing Z-scores across countries and income groups. The findings remain robust across alternative specifications and estimators. Bank-level fundamentals—capitalisation, liquidity, and credit—enhance stability, whereas higher non-performing loans and risk exposure amplify fragility. Macroeconomic conditions also matter, with stronger growth, institutional quality and external balances supporting resilience, while inflation, economic policy uncertainty and expansionary government spending weaken stability. By integrating time-varying volatility modelling with dynamic panel techniques in a large cross-country setting, this study provides new global evidence that exchange rate volatility is not merely a macroeconomic fluctuation but a structural source of banking-sector risk. The findings carry important implications for macroprudential policy, foreign-exchange management, and coordinated monetary–fiscal responses aimed at safeguarding financial stability in open economies.
Oyadeyi et al. (2026) studied this question.