The article explores how Colombia’s state constructions impact Indigenous recognition in urban areas, suggesting transitional justice measures may reinforce essentialist views.
This article traces the Colombian state’s constructions of indigeneity and territory to highlight their enduring inter-relation. In this inter-relation, “territory” is conflated with rural areas, and territorial rights are confined to Indigenous resguardos (reserves). Three political implications arise from this inter-relation. First, Indigenous collectives in urban areas face continued obstacles to recognition. Second, while resguardos have been critiqued for enclosing communities, attention should also be paid to Indigenous political struggles to exceed their boundaries. Third, some transitional justice measures that grant victimhood to Indigenous territories have reproduced essentialist notions of “territory” and culture, undermining their decolonial potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jennifer Bates (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Human Rights Quarterly