Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Article reveals a gap between justice expectations and EU accountability in sanctioning Russia's power networks.
This article traces how the Court of Justice of the European Union has developed a doctrinal framework for EU sanctions against Russia under Regulation (EU) No 269/2014. This case law forms a coherent body of reasoning reconciling post-Soviet legacies with contemporary geopolitical imperatives and evidential rigour. By refining the meaning and temporal scope of accountability within the listing criteria, the Court defines the vocabulary guiding asset-freezing decisions and maps Russia’s interwoven networks of power, capital, and state influence. This case law reveals a gap between law and societal expectations of justice, leaving unaddressed the enduring post-Soviet privileges underpinning Putin’s regime.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katarzyna J. McNaughton (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: