PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Discover Artificial Intelligence0 citationsOpen Access

Barriers to deep learning implementation in orthodontics: data, methodological, and translational challenges—a scoping review

View Full Paper
FAFarah Ghanim AghaNANameer Al-TaaiAIAbdullah Ibrahim

Key Points

  • This scoping review explores barriers limiting deep learning integration in orthodontics.
  • Conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines
  • Performed electronic searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore
  • Included studies on quantitative performance of deep learning orthodontic applications
  • Used a standardized charting form for data extraction
  • Synthesized findings using a barrier-centered thematic approach
  • Identified 26 studies from 612 records with high internal performance
  • Barriers include limited dataset diversity and single-center data sourcing
  • Absence of external validation and methodological heterogeneity restrict translation
  • Clinical implementation hampered by reliance on controlled research settings and insufficient real-world testing
  • Stronger validation standards and collaborative multicenter research are needed for better integration into practice

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) has attracted increasing attention in orthodontics, with many studies reporting high diagnostic and predictive accuracy. However, despite these promising results, routine clinical adoption remains limited. This scoping review aimed to explore the main barriers that restrict the translation of DL systems from research environments into everyday orthodontic practice. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore for English-language studies published between 2015 and June 2025. Studies reporting quantitative performance of DL-based orthodontic applications were included. Data were extracted using a standardized charting form and synthesized using a barrier-centered thematic approach. From 612 records, 26 studies were included. While most demonstrated high internal performance, consistent barriers to clinical implementation were identified. These primarily involved limited dataset diversity, single-center data sourcing, absence of external validation, and methodological heterogeneity. In addition, reliance on controlled research settings and insufficient real-world testing further restricted translation into routine orthodontic practice. Although deep learning shows promising technical performance in orthodontics, meaningful clinical integration remains limited. Overcoming current barriers will require stronger validation standards, greater transparency, collaborative multicenter research, and implementation strategies that align with real clinical workflows.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Agha et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4da8c0f03fd67763f7chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-01306-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper