Ancient quarries are some of the hardest ‘cultural landscapes’ to visualize, as their material remains are usually mundane and often scattered over large areas. As non-monumental sites they largely figure low on heritage conservation agendas and in public consciousness and are still rather peripheral to archaeological research as they are often seen in a limited, usually technological, context. These aspects combined have contributed to their gradual disappearance and/or neglect. This paper discusses the development and deployment of a methodology that can provide frameworks through which the significance of quarries can be made more accessible to a much wider audience. Case studies from three diverse quarries in the Eastern Mediterranean demonstrate the flexibility of this method in terms of how we go about evaluating significance at the broadest possible level. Connecting people, past and present, with quarries allows us to convey them as integral to other places and/or social transformations of more widely known historical significance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elizabeth Bloxam (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: