Why the study?
Do rat models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus exhibit different patterns of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction?
Do rat models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus exhibit different patterns of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction?
Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus exhibit distinct patterns of diabetic cardiomyopathy in rat models, with type 1 characterized mainly by systolic dysfunction and type 2 by increased diastolic stiffness.
Rat models indicate DM-type specific LV dysfunction; hypothesis-generating for distinct human diabetic cardiomyopathy phenotypes.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with characteristic structural and functional changes of the myocardium, termed diabetic cardiomyopathy. As a distinct entity independent of coronary atherosclerosis, diabetic cardiomyopathy is an increasingly recognized cause of heart failure. A detailed understanding of diabetic cardiac dysfunction, using relevant animal models, is required for the effective prevention and treatment of cardiovascular complications in diabetic patients. We investigated and compared cardiac performance in rat models of type 1 DM (streptozotocin induced) and type 2 DM (Zucker diabetic fatty rats) using a pressure-volume (P-V) conductance catheter system. Left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function was evaluated in vivo at different preloads, including the slope of the end-systolic P-V relation (ESPVR) and end-diastolic P-V relationship (EDPVR), preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW), maximal slope of the systolic pressure increment (dP/dt(max)), and its relation to end-diastolic volume (dP/dt(max)-EDV) as well as the time constant of LV relaxation and maximal slope of the diastolic pressure decrement. Type 1 DM was associated with decreased LV systolic pressure, dP/dt(max), slope of ESPVR and dP/dt(max)-EDV, PRSW, ejection fraction, and cardiac and stroke work indexes, indicating marked systolic dysfunction. In type 2 DM rats, systolic indexes were altered only to a lower extent and the increase of LV stiffness was more pronounced, as indicated by the higher slopes of EDPVR. Our data suggest that DM is characterized by decreased systolic performance and delayed relaxation (mainly in type 1 DM), accompanied by increased diastolic stiffness of the heart (more remarkably in type 2 DM). Based on the sophisticated method of P-V analysis, different characteristics of type 1 and type 2 diabetic cardiac dysfunction can be demonstrated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radovits et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: