Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective study identifies factors linked to bystander intervention in witnessed foreign body airway obstruction events.
Foreign body airway obstruction (FBAO) is a time-critical emergency. Although bystander removal maneuvers can improve outcomes, they are not consistently attempted even when events are witnessed. We aimed to identify patient-, witness-, and setting-related factors associated with the absence of bystander removal attempts in witnessed FBAO. We analyzed a prospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort from the MOCHI registry in Japan, including patients with witnessed FBAO. The primary outcome was absence of a bystander removal attempt. Multivariable logistic regression with multiple imputation for missing data was used to examine associations with patient age, sex, eating function, location (home, care facility, public), and witness/bystander age and sex. Among 325 witnessed FBAO events, 193 (59%) involved a removal attempt and 132 (41%) did not. The median patient age was 81 years. Attempt rates varied by location: 82% in care facilities, 52% at home, 43% in public places. Witnesses/bystanders were significantly older in events without an attempt (median 60 vs. 50 years). Older witness/bystander age was independently associated with higher odds of no attempt (OR 1.39 per 10-year increase; 95% CI 1.14–1.70). Compared with home, no attempt was less frequent in care facilities (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.20–0.93) and more frequent in public places (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08–4.10). In witnessed FBAO, removal attempts were less likely when witnesses were older and when events occurred in public places. These findings may help inform age-tailored and setting-specific first-aid strategies to increase bystander intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Igarashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: