Study discovers governing equations in geomechanics, suggesting new modeling methods for complex systems.
Geomechanical processes commonly involve strong multiphysics coupling and pronounced scale disparity, while the governing equations used in practice are often prescribed a priori and calibrated from limited observations. When the assumed analytical form is misspecified, such template-based modeling can introduce structural bias. This study addresses the discovery of explicit three-dimensional coupled partial differential equations from sparse observations and proposes a Physics-Informed Symbolic Genetic Algorithm (PI-SGA) to improve tractability, identifiability, and physical admissibility in strongly coupled systems. The framework combines three components: (i) a tensor-consistent operator library that restricts symbolic search to frame-consistent candidates; (ii) a field-separation strategy that reformulates coupled discovery into single-field regressions with measured exogenous coupling inputs; and (iii) a stochastic spatiotemporal collocation scheme that reduces the cost of three-dimensional discovery while preserving the dynamics required for identification. PI-SGA is evaluated on three benchmark systems with distinct coupled behaviors: Biot poroelasticity, incompressible Navier–Stokes flow, and a Turing reaction–diffusion system. Across these cases, the framework recovers compact governing structures with coefficients consistent with the reference models under sparse sampling. Sensitivity analyses under 0–10% observational noise show stable structural recovery with benchmark-dependent coefficient sensitivity, and comparison with PySINDy indicates improved robustness in coupled and noise-sensitive settings, albeit at increased computational cost. Additional forward validation under shifted initial conditions, while preserving the original boundary-condition class, further supports the physical fidelity of the recovered equations within the tested benchmark regime. The proposed workflow provides a physically constrained and interpretable baseline for discovering three-dimensional coupled governing equations in geomechanics-motivated applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: