Why the study?
Does new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation increase the long-term risk of stroke and death in patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery?
Does new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation increase the long-term risk of stroke and death in patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery?
New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation after isolated CABG is independently associated with a significantly increased long-term risk of stroke and death.
Heightens long-term stroke and mortality vigilance after CABG with new-onset AF; extends observational data but leaves open need for intervention trials.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: We sought to evaluate the long-term impact of post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation on the risk of stroke and survival. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery from April 1, 1995 to March 31, 2007 were identified (n = 8058). Long-term stroke data were compiled using Cox modeling adjusted for clinical characteristics comparing patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NwAfib) and those without. RESULTS: NwAfib developed in 2214 patients (27.5%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 2.4% and was not different between groups. Unadjusted in-hospital outcomes suggest patients with NwAfib were more likely to suffer a permanent stroke (1% vs 2.5%; p < 0.001) require prolonged mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001) and prolonged stay in hospital (p < 0.001). After discharge patients were followed for a mean of 5.7 years. Stroke was reported in 268 (12.1%) patients in the NwAfib group compared to others (8.4%). After adjustment NwAfib was independently associated with a higher risk for stroke with a hazard ratio of 1.26 (1.08-1.47; p = 0.0034) and a higher risk of death with a hazard ratio of 1.2 (1.08-1.32; p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NwAfib perioperatively have increased risk of stroke and early death after discharge independent of other clinical risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horwich et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: