Demonstrates enhanced bonding and self-healing in supramolecular PDMS adhesives, suggesting promising applications in sustainable materials.
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) materials are widely used due to their flexibility and low surface energy, yet their inherently weak substrate adhesion, lack of intrinsic room-temperature self-healing, and poor recyclability severely restrict high-value and sustainable applications. Herein, we report a supramolecular PDMS-based system that simultaneously achieves strong interfacial adhesion, rapid room-temperature self-healing, and efficient recyclability through rational molecular design. By grafting 2-ureido-4[1H]-pyrimidinone (UPy) motifs onto a thiol-containing polyester–PDMS backbone via thiol–ene chemistry, a dynamically cross-linked network featuring reversible quadruple hydrogen bonding was constructed. The UPy units serve dual roles: at moderate loading, they form reversible physical cross-links that enable fast intrinsic self-healing at room temperature; above a critical threshold, they self-assemble into microcrystalline domains that significantly enhance mechanical strength and storage modulus. Meanwhile, polarity contrast between siloxane chains and UPy moieties induces an intrinsic self-stratifying effect, where low-surface-energy PDMS segments enrich at the air interface while polar UPy groups accumulate at the substrate interface. This spatial organization reconciles the long-standing conflict between surface hydrophobicity and strong adhesion, leading to lap shear strengths exceeding 1 MPa on diverse substrates without complex pretreatment. Importantly, the fully supramolecular network allows repeated recycling via solvent treatment or hot pressing with negligible performance degradation. This work establishes a unified strategy that integrates dynamic hydrogen-bond cross-linking and interfacial self-organization, offering a promising molecular design strategy for repairable, recyclable, and high-performance silicone adhesives and coatings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: