PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation0 citationsOpen Access

Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study of Inebilizumab vs Low-Dose Rituximab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

View Full Paper
QXQiao XuThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityLZLinming ZhangKunming Medical UniversityXDXinyi DuanShenzhen University

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of inebilizumab compared to low-dose rituximab in patients with NMOSD.
  • Multicenter, retrospective-prospective analysis of NMOSD patients from 6 cities in China.
  • Included aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G seropositive patients treated with either inebilizumab or low-dose rituximab (500 mg).
  • Utilized a 1-year follow-up and advanced statistical models for outcome assessment.
  • Inebilizumab reduced relapse risk more effectively than low-dose rituximab, with a significant p-value of 0.003.
  • Lower rates of key adverse events were observed in patients receiving inebilizumab compared to those on low-dose RTX.
  • Class III evidence suggests inebilizumab is a more effective and well-tolerated option for NMOSD treatment.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Inebilizumab and rituximab (RTX) are anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 B cell-depleting antibodies, respectively. They are both used in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). However, limited data on both drugs exist regarding real-world clinical applications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of inebilizumab vs low-dose RTX in NMOSD patients through a retrospective-prospective multicenter analysis. METHODS: This study collected data on aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G seropositive NMOSD patients from 6 cities in China among those receiving either inebilizumab or low-dose RTX (500 mg), with a 1-year follow-up. Analyses assessed outcomes using inverse probability of treatment weighting and doubly robust models. RESULTS: = 0.003). DISCUSSION: In this short-term study, inebilizumab demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing relapse risk, along with significantly lower rates of key adverse events, compared with low-dose RTX in patients with NMOSD. These findings support the use of inebilizumab as an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option in a broader NMOSD population. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This short-term study with a 12-month observation period provides Class III evidence that in patients with NMOSD, inebilizumab is more effective than low-dose RTX in reducing relapses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f0e31e5f7920c6386eafhttps://doi.org/10.1212/nxi.0000000000200586
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Inebilizumab in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Dual-Center, Real-World Cohort Study.2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Case report: Transition from anti-CD20 therapy to inebilizumab for 14 cases of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder2024 · 10 citations
  3. 3Safety and Effectiveness of Inebilizumab in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: Interim Analysis of a Post-marketing Surveillance in Japan2026
  4. 4Inebilizumab in AQP4 ‐Seropositive NMOSD : One‐Year Follow‐Up From a Multicenter, Real‐World Study2026
  5. 5A Real-world Study of Inebilizumab in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: One-year Follow up Results (P6-1.004)2026