Comparative analysis finds differences in vestibular function in cochlear implant recipients with and without inner ear malformations, suggesting clinical implications.
Objective: To compare long-term vestibular function in cochlear implant (CI) recipients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and those without inner ear malformations (No IEMs). Methods: A comparative analysis was conducted on 53 CI recipients (27 with EVA, 26 withNo IEMs).Vestibular function was assessed using caloric testing, vestibular evoked myogenic https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215126104782Published online
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: