Investigates mechanical properties of locust tibial cuticle under thermal exposure, suggesting viscoelastic adaptation.
The mechanical performance of insect cuticle arises from its composite structure of chitin fibres embedded in a protein-rich matrix. While chitin contributes to thermal resistance and structural integrity, the protein component is temperature-sensitive and modulates viscoelastic behaviour. Here, we investigated how thermal exposure affects the mechanical properties of tibial cuticle in Locusta migratoria, using dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) across a temperature range (22–74 °C) and following prior heating to 60 °C or 70 °C. Both storage and loss moduli decreased significantly with increasing temperature by approx. 64% respectively 42%, consistent with partially reversible thermal softening. After re-cooling, the loss modulus increased again to control levels, whereas the storage modulus remained significantly reduced. Tan δ increased significantly with increasing temperature by approx. 31% and remained higher in pre-heated samples, reflecting a shift toward more compliant and dissipative behaviour. No significant differences were detected between the 60 °C and 70 °C treatments. These results suggest that thermal exposure induces reversible changes in matrix protein mobility and non-covalent interactions, affecting stiffness more strongly than damping. The cuticle thus exhibits partial recovery of mechanical function after heating, which may reflect an adaptive response to transient thermal stress. • Dynamic mechanical analysis reveals temperature-dependent changes in locust tibial cuticle. • Heating to 60 °C or 70 °C causes reversible reduction in stiffness but persistent increase in damping. • Loss modulus fully recovers after cooling, suggesting reversible viscoelastic adaptation. • Changes likely result from reversible alterations in matrix protein interactions. • Thermoresponsive cuticle mechanics may help maintain leg function under environmental heat stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuhn et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: