PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Lara D. Veeken

P125 Using a novel event driven composite endpoint to evaluate differences in long term outcomes across systemic sclerosis subgroups

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PYPhilip YeeMKMedha KanitkarSRStefano Rodolfi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial evaluates long-term outcomes in systemic sclerosis subgroups, highlighting ACA's role in disease progression.

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate long-term outcomes in systemic sclerosis, focusing on differences between patients with and without anti-centromere antibodies.
  • Analyzed demographic, clinical, and serological data from 2894 systemic sclerosis patients.
  • Assessed time to reach the MINIMISE endpoint, defined by various disease progression criteria.
  • Performed time to event analysis including Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression.
  • 31.6% of patients reached the MINIMISE outcome in the first 10 years, with 543 from the limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis group.
  • Hazard ratio for event frequency in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis vs. limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis was 4.93 (95% CI: 4.09-5.93, p < 0.001).
  • ACA-negative patients in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis had more frequent events than ACA-positive patients, HR 0.49 (95% CI: 0.36-0.67, p < 0.001).

Cite This Study

Yee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f19c1e5f7920c63873e2https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag121.159
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share