Systematic review examines anticancer activity mechanisms of thiazoles and thiazolidinones, highlighting significant gaps in evaluations.
With global cancer cases projected to reach 35 million by 2050 and drug resistance to existing chemotherapeutic drugs remaining a significant threat in cancer therapy, accounting for up to 90% of chemotherapy failures, the search for novel anticancer compounds continues to be increasingly important. This systematic review (2021–2025) examined the role of thiazoles and 4-thiazolidinones/thiazolidinediones as popular scaffolds in existing anticancer drug design. While researchers continue to focus on well-established molecular targets, such as EGFR, VEGFR-2, and tubulin, there is a notable difference regarding other preferred choices for thiazoles and 4-thiazolidinones/thiazolidinediones. Among analyzed mechanisms of anticancer activity notably favored for thiazoles was the inhibition of serine/threonine protein kinases (CDK-2, BRAFV600E), while for 4-thiazolidinones/thiazolidinediones more studied were ROS generation and PPARγ activation. Furthermore, less-researched mechanisms of anticancer activity with no FDA-approved drugs such as PTP1B, SIRT2, PKM2, eIF4E, CA XI and XII inhibition for thiazole derivatives and pan-PIM kinase and BAG3 protein inhibition for 4-thiazolidinones/thiazolidinediones were evaluated as well. Notable was the popularity of the multi-targeting approach for modern drug design, with ~30% reporting two or more targets for their compounds. Despite these advancements, the review identified critical gaps in ADMET evaluations, safety analyzing against normal human cells and the lack of mechanistic studies connecting the targeted protein and the compounds anticancer effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dudchak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: