PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Scientific Reports2 citationsOpen Access

A case study to compare the methods of SOC estimation for lithium-ion batteries using second-order RC circuit model

HXH. Y. XuJWJ. L. WangWWW. W. Wang

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare various state-of-charge (SOC) estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries using a second-order RC circuit model.
  • Established a second-order RC equivalent circuit model for a 24 Ah lithium-ion battery.
  • Compared three parameter identification methods (RLS, FFRLS, and VFFRLS) and two state estimation algorithms (EKF and UKF).
  • Analyzed the performance of these methods using HPPC test and constant-current discharge data.
  • EKF maintains terminal voltage errors within 80 mV and converges SOC estimation errors after approximately 1700 s, with RMSE of 8.93%.
  • UKF shows better performance with terminal voltage errors mainly within 20 mV and SOC estimation errors within 2%.
  • The VFFRLS–UKF combination achieves the best SOC estimation under dynamic conditions.

Abstract

Accurate modeling and state-of-charge (SOC) estimation of power batteries are key issues in battery management systems (BMSs). In this study, a 24 Ah lithium-ion power battery is taken as the research object. Based on HPPC test data and constant-current discharge data, a second-order RC equivalent circuit model is established, and the performance of three parameter identification methods (RLS, FFRLS, and VFFRLS) as well as two state estimation algorithms (EKF and UKF) for SOC estimation is systematically compared.The results show that all three algorithms can achieve online parameter identification, among which VFFRLS improves parameter convergence speed and identification accuracy through a dynamically adjusted forgetting factor. For SOC estimation, the EKF maintains terminal voltage errors within 80 mV, and the SOC estimation error converges after approximately 1700 s, with an RMSE of 8.93%. In contrast, the UKF exhibits better performance, with terminal voltage errors mainly within 20 mV (maximum below 50 mV) and SOC estimation errors within 2%. Overall, the VFFRLS–UKF combination demonstrates the best SOC estimation performance under dynamic operating conditions.The results provide a reference for the selection and optimization of online SOC estimation methods in practical BMS applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f19c1e5f7920c638743ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49526-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper