Compares sperm motility and DNA integrity using swim-up–zeta and density gradient-zeta methods, indicating efficiency in sperm selection.
Objective: Sperm preparation techniques, such as the swim-up method and density gradient centrifugation, are essential for selecting the highest-quality spermatozoa in the context of assisted reproductive technologies. The zeta method, in which sperm are selected based on their surface electrical charge, has recently emerged as a simple and cost-effective adjunct to improve sperm selection. This study aimed to compare sperm motility and DNA integrity between sperm prepared using a combination of the swim-up and zeta methods (S-Z) and sperm prepared with a combination of density gradient centrifugation and the zeta method (D-Z). Methods: Thirty-nine normozoospermic semen samples were randomly divided into two aliquots. One aliquot was prepared using S-Z and the other using D-Z. Post-preparation sperm motility was assessed using computer-assisted sperm analysis, and DNA integrity was evaluated with acridine orange staining. Results: Both preparation methods significantly reduced sperm concentration compared to neat semen (p<0.001). The total motility rate was significantly higher in the S-Z group (90%) than in the D-Z group (86%) (p<0.001). Normal sperm DNA integrity was comparable between the S-Z (95.0%) and D-Z (95.3%) groups (p=0.582). Conclusion: Integrating the zeta method into conventional sperm preparation techniques may increase the efficiency of sperm selection. The S-Z approach appears particularly effective for recovering highly motile sperm with normal DNA integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thanaboonyawat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: