Simulation study analyzes multi-stage expansion processes to improve power generation from high-pressure natural gas wellheads, suggesting optimal configurations.
During natural gas production and transportation, multi-stage pressure regulation is often required to meet downstream pressure demands, resulting in substantial waste of residual pressure energy at high-pressure wellheads. This study focuses on high-pressure natural gas at the wellhead of the XC gas well in western Sichuan. Based on thermodynamic and exergy analysis, Aspen HYSYS was employed to simulate residual pressure power generation processes, and a systematic comparison was conducted between single-stage and multi-stage expansion schemes. Under operating conditions of an inlet pressure of 20 MPa, an inlet temperature of 70 °C, and a flow rate of 50 × 104 m3/d, the influence of operating parameters on power generation performance was analyzed. The results indicate that power output increases with increasing natural gas flow rate and inlet temperature but decreases with increasing outlet pressure. Under large pressure differential conditions, single-stage expansion is unable to meet the requirements of high-pressure wellhead residual pressure power generation due to excessive temperature drop and limitations in existing expander performance. On this basis, two-stage, three-stage, and four-stage expansion power generation processes were further developed, and the effects of intermediate pressure selection on power output, heating demand, and pressure energy recovery efficiency were systematically examined. The results show that operating under equal expansion ratio conditions enhances pressure energy utilization. By comprehensively comparing power generation performance, heating power requirements, and economic feasibility, the two-stage expansion scheme was identified as the most favorable option under the investigated operating conditions, providing a practical reference for process design and engineering applications of high-pressure natural gas wellhead residual pressure power generation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: