Quantitative study explores adoption of digital gold schemes among investors, highlighting trust and social influence as key factors.
This study examines the adoption of digital gold savings schemes among Millennial and Generation Z investors in India, with a focus on three theoretically grounded determinants: perceived usefulness, trust and security, and social influence. Employing a quantitative, descriptive-cum-explanatory research design, primary data were collected from 143 respondents using a structured, closed-ended questionnaire. Analytical techniques included descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Pearson correlation analysis, multiple linear regression, independent-samples t-test, and one-way Welch ANOVA. Results indicate a moderate overall adoption level (M = 3.06, SD = 0.583 on a five-point Likert scale). Trust/security (β = 0.196, p = .016) and social influence (β = 0.230, p = .005) emerged as statistically significant positive predictors of adoption, whereas perceived usefulness did not attain significance (β = 0.066, p = .412). The regression model was statistically significant overall [F(3, 139) = 5.19, p = .002, R² = 0.101]. No significant generational cohort difference (t = 0.301, p = .764) or income-group difference (F = 1.07, p = .381) in adoption was detected. The findings suggest that confidence in platform integrity and peer or social-media-driven legitimacy are stronger adoption drivers than functional utility alone. Theoretical and managerial implications for fintech providers, wealth-technology firms, and policymakers are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shreevalli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: