PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Buildings11 citationsOpen Access

Model Test Study on the Effect of Quasi-Rectangular Shield Tunnel Excavation on Adjacent Pile Foundation in Sand

View Full Paper
HDHongguo DiaoZZZhiwei ZhouGWGang Wei

Key Points

  • To examine how quasi-rectangular shield tunneling affects single piles and pile groups in sandy soil.
  • Conducted physical model tests with varying underpass configurations of quasi-rectangular shield tunneling and circular tunnels.
  • Analyzed ground surface settlement, single-pile settlement, and axial force distribution during tunneling.
  • In the overlapping underpass case, ground surface settlement was 3.6 times greater than the orthogonal case, with a narrower settlement trough.
  • Maximum axial force increases for the single pile in the overlapping case were 20%, alongside notable increases in bending moments (13% and 6%).
  • The front pile in a group provided a significant shielding effect on the rear pile, influenced by the pile cap.

Abstract

Tunneling activity inevitably induces soil stress redistribution and ground deformation, which may affect adjacent existing pile foundations. Since many previous studies have mainly focused on circular tunnels, the effects of quasi-rectangular shield (QRS) tunneling on adjacent existing pile foundations are not well investigated and understood. In this study, a series of physical model tests were carried out to investigate the response of a single pile and pile group subjected to newly QRS tunneling beneath an existing circular tunnel in dry sand. Two distinct underpass cases were considered: an orthogonal underpass (QRS tunnel axis perpendicular to the circular tunnel axis) and an overlapping underpass (QRS tunnel axis aligned with the circular tunnel axis). The test results indicate that QRS tunneling-induced ground surface settlement and single-pile settlement in the overlapping underpass case were 3.6 and 1.2 times that in the orthogonal underpass case, respectively, with a narrower settlement trough. The axial force distribution along the single pile remained qualitatively consistent in both underpass cases, consistently exhibiting a downward load-transfer mechanism, and further leading to a monotonic growth pattern in axial force with progressive QRS tunnel excavation. The additional stress of the single pile was consistently higher in the overlapping underpass case, which had maximum axial force, negative bending moment, and maximum positive bending moment increases of 20%, 13%, and 6%, respectively, relative to the orthogonal underpass case. The front pile in the pile group exerted a pronounced shielding effect on the rear pile, while the restraining action of the pile cap also contributed measurably to the overall pile responses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f2221e5f7920c6387959https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16091704
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper