Randomized trial compares liso-cel outcomes in relapsed follicular lymphoma, indicating significant efficacy improvement over standard care.
In TRANSCEND FL, lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) demonstrated strong efficacy, with 97% overall response rate (ORR) and 94% complete response (CR) rate in third-line or later (3 L+) follicular lymphoma (FL). Here, we compared efficacy and safety of liso-cel from TRANSCEND FL to standard-of-care (SOC [excluding T-cell-engaging therapies]) by constructing an external control arm (ECA) of patients from historical clinical trials and real-world practice. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), ECA cohort was balanced to match TRANSCEND FL. After IPTW, liso-cel-treated patients had significantly higher ORR (relative risk: 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-1.6) and CR rate (2.4; 2.1-2.7) than SOC. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) for duration of response (0.26; 0.15-0.46), time to next treatment (0.24; 0.13-0.44), progression-free survival (0.28; 0.17-0.48), and overall survival (0.40; 0.19-0.84) significantly favored liso-cel, demonstrating meaningful efficacy improvement with liso-cel over SOC, solidifying liso-cel as a treatment option for patients with 3 L + FL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nastoupil et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: