Demonstrates enhanced load restoration in disaster-hit power networks, suggesting improved resilience.
In response to the influence of extreme disasters, damage to distribution lines and user outages, a parallel implementation strategy is proposed for emergency repair of disaster-damaged distribution networks and rapid restoration of power supply for users, considering the collaboration of “human–vehicle–road–pile” resources. This strategy constructs a hierarchical optimization framework, with the upper-level model aiming to minimize the repair time for disaster damage. It adopts a collaborative optimization approach between repair resources and transportation routes to quickly repair the connection between the distribution network and the main power network. In the lower-level model, a model predictive control mechanism is adopted to schedule electric vehicles (EVs) in Real-time as mobile energy storage systems, and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) service technology is used to provide an emergency power supply for key loads during the repair period, achieving parallel optimization of “repair–restoration”. Considering constraints such as emergency repair resources, time-varying transportation, electric vehicle scheduling and power management, charging pile capacity, power flow safety of the distribution network, and topology of the distribution network, second-order cone relaxation technology is adopted to improve solving efficiency. The simulation results show that compared with the traditional serial restoration strategy, the proposed strategy delivers a dual benefit: it significantly eliminates the power supply vacuum period without compromising the efficiency of emergency repair operations. Specifically, it increases weighted load restoration by 57.2% compared with traditional sequential methods and reduces the average outage time for key loads from 3.22 h to 0.5 h, effectively enhancing the resilience and restoration ability of the power supply guarantee of the distribution network.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: