Key result
ARIMA-SPC delivers stronger anomaly detection for exercise-induced fatigue vs LSTM, cutting inference time ~67%.
Why the study?
Most fatigue-detection approaches rely on computationally intensive black-box models or apply thresholding without correcting for serial dependence, risking inflated false alarms when signals are autocorrelated.
Does an ARIMA-SPC framework improve anomaly-detection performance and reduce inference time compared to an LSTM model for detecting exercise-induced fatigue in healthy participants?
Observational (n=32)
Does an ARIMA-SPC framework improve anomaly-detection performance and reduce inference time compared to an LSTM model for detecting exercise-induced fatigue in healthy participants?
The ARIMA-SPC framework provides an interpretable, computationally efficient, and highly accurate method for real-time detection of exercise-induced fatigue from biomechanical data.
Most fatigue-detection approaches for biomechanics rely on computationally intensive black-box models or apply thresholding without correcting for serial dependence, risking inflated false alarms when signals are autocorrelated. This study proposes an autoregressive integrated moving average with statistical process control (ARIMA-SPC) framework that models temporal dependence and identifies fatigue-related biomechanical anomalies from time-normalized ground reaction force and tibial inertial measurement units waveforms. In 32 participants performing repeated 90° lateral cutting maneuver trials before and after a 5-km variable-speed fatigue protocol. This is evident from their autocorrelation function plots, which oscillate and decay exponentially, forming a characteristic "tail-off" pattern. The most compelling finding is that the lag value of the coronal plane with ground reaction force is markedly greater than those of the other two planes (p<0.05). Relative to the long short-term memory model, the ARIMA-SPC model was easier to interpret and delivered stronger anomaly-detection performance, particularly in sensitivity (recall 0.88 vs 0.80; precision 0.92 vs 0.85; F1 score 0.90 vs 0.82). The ARIMA-SPC approach also demonstrated substantially lower inference time (5 s vs 15 s), indicating low computational burden compatible with real-time monitoring constraints. The findings of this study have practical applications in the development of real-time monitoring systems to detect exercise-induced fatigue. And prewhitened residual monitoring provides an interpretable and computationally efficient route for fatigue-related biomechanical anomaly detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Exercise-induced fatigue in healthy participants (n=32). ARIMA-SPC framework vs. Long short-term memory (LSTM) model was evaluated on Anomaly-detection performance (F1 score). The ARIMA-SPC framework delivered stronger anomaly-detection performance for exercise-induced fatigue compared to the LSTM model (F1 score 0.90 vs 0.82) with lower inference time (5 s vs 15 s).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: