PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2026Buildings5 citationsOpen Access

Industrial Waste Recycling for Sustainable Building Materials: A Review

E(Elena Ciutac (Nicolaev)VGViorica GhismanCICatalina Iticescu

Key Points

  • The review addresses the need for construction materials that lower environmental impact through industrial waste valorization.
  • Critical evaluation of various industrial wastes and their applications in construction materials.
  • Assessment of performance characteristics, durability, and environmental impact of recycled materials.
  • Analysis of existing challenges such as waste variability and technological maturity.
  • Supplementary cementitious materials can reduce CO2 emissions by approximately 20-50%.
  • Alkali-activated binders can achieve CO2 reductions of 40-80% compared to Portland cement.
  • Recycled aggregates can replace up to 100% of natural aggregates while enhancing material properties.

Abstract

The construction sector consumes significant amounts of natural resources and contributes substantially to global CO2 emissions, making it necessary to develop materials with a reduced environmental impact. In this context, the valorization of reusable industrial waste as secondary raw materials represents a strategic direction for applying circular economy principles and for decarbonizing the construction materials industry. The scientific problem addressed in this review is the urgent need to develop construction materials with a reduced environmental footprint, given that the construction sector is a major consumer of natural resources and a significant contributor to global CO2 emissions. This challenge requires the identification and critical evaluation of sustainable solutions that support decarbonization and the transition toward a circular economy. The main findings indicate that the valorization of industrial waste offers high decarbonization potential: supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as ground granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash, can reduce CO2 emissions by approximately 20–50%, while alkali-activated binders and geopolymers achieve reductions of 40–80% compared to Portland cement. These materials also enhance durability, extending service life by 10–20% in aggressive environments, although early-age strength may decrease by 10–30%; recycled aggregates derived from construction and demolition waste (CDW) can substitute up to 100% of natural aggregates, while rubber fibers can increase impact resistance by 30–50% and reduce density by 10–20%. However, key limitations relate to waste variability, heavy metal leaching risks (requiring immobilization efficiencies > 90%), and the relatively low technological maturity of many solutions (TRL < 7), leading to the TRL–CO2 paradox and highlighting the need for standardization and performance-based regulatory frameworks. The synthesized results indicate that the appropriate integration of industrial waste enables a significant reduction in clinker content, lowers associated CO2 emissions, and decreases primary energy consumption while maintaining physical–mechanical properties and durability characteristics comparable to or in some cases superior to those of traditional materials, if mix design is based on clear performance criteria, stratified according to the type of waste, dosage used, curing regime, binder chemistry, and the target application.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

(Nicolaev) et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f443cb967e944ac5566dc8https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16091741
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper