Theoretical analysis uncovers structural selection boundaries, indicating which systems persist over time.
No additional selection mechanism is required. Selection follows necessarily from the persistence condition IR = R/IK ≤ 1. Systems that violate this condition cannot persist as themselves. Systems that satisfy it can. This is not a claim about selection — it is the structural consequence of a condition that any persistent system must satisfy. The central result is the Monotonic Admissibility Theorem: under non-regulation, the set of persistent systems is monotonically non-increasing over time. What is commonly called selection is the population-level projection of this structural boundary. Additionally, three established selection frameworks — biological natural selection, economic market selection, and technological diffusion — reduce to differential persistence within the admissible set. Selection does not operate on systems. It is the boundary that determines which systems continue to exist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marc Maibom (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: