Demonstrates early congestion detection in underground expressways, indicating a new approach for traffic management.
Traffic flow in long underground expressways is expected to exhibit amplified spatiotemporal variability due to confined geometry, longitudinal gradients, limited recovery space, and heterogeneous vehicle interactions. As these facilities remain at the planning stage, empirical field data are unavailable, necessitating simulation-based methodological development. Conventional performance indicators (average speed) primarily reflect macroscopic deterioration after congestion has materialized and are therefore insufficient for capturing early variability transitions. This study proposes a composite Spatiotemporal Variability Metric (STVM) designed to quantify instability-related variability dynamics and enable early congestion detection in confined expressway environments. The metric structure was established through the synthesis of prior traffic flow instability research and systematic evaluation of 72 predesigned microscopic simulation scenarios representing diverse geometric and operational conditions. STVM integrates six mechanism-informed components: short-term speed and density fluctuations, heavy-vehicle proportion, sectional saturation level, ramp interference intensity, and exit discharge efficiency. Comparative analyses against average speed demonstrated that variability escalation measured by STVM consistently precedes observable speed degradation by 5–20 min. Internal contribution analyses using correlation, regression, and random forest modeling further confirmed the dominant structural roles of fluctuation- and saturation-related components in governing variability escalation. These findings confirm the usefulness of the STVM in analyzing transition dynamics and supporting real-time ITS-based monitoring in confined expressway systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: