Quasi-experimental study evaluates nursing care effects on patient outcomes in critically ill cardiac patients, indicating improved care practices.
Background: Electrophysiology (EP) programs that involve specialized nurses and advanced practice providers (APPs) have a positive impact on patient outcomes, leading to improved safety, reduced complications, better patient education, and increased efficiency. Cardiac electrophysiological study is a diagnostic test used to evaluate the heart's electrical conduction system and diagnose the abnormal heartbeats. Aim of the study: To evaluate the effect of providing a designed nursing care program on selected outcomes of the critically ill patients undergoing cardiac EPS. Research design: A quasi-experimental research design was utilized in the current study (pre‐test and post‐test). Sample: purposive sample of 60 adult (M&F) critically ill patients who met the inclusion criteria. Setting: The study was conducted in Critical Care Department Cairo university hospitals. Research hypotheses. Four research hypotheses were formulated in the current study. Tools: Five tools were utilized to collect data pertinent to the study T1: Demographic & medical data sheet T2: State–Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI) assessment Sheet T3: Pre/Post Nursing care program knowledge questionnaire T4: Observational checklist (5parts) T5: Patient outcomes assessment & complications sheet Results:- Majority of the (S&C)subject were males (60.0%).All four research hypotheses were supported as follows; Knowledge Improvement (𝑯𝟏): The study group's mean knowledge scores increased significantly from 6.80 ±2.25 pre-program to 35.40 ±0.97 post-program, while control group scores remained low (6.07 ±1.95 vs. 6.03 ±1.50 ), indicating a high-impact educational intervention. Practice Improvement (H2): Mean practice scores for the study group showed significant improvement (43.47 ±3.31 pre-program vs. 56.66 ±5.87 post-program). The control group showed no significant improvement (44.65 ±3.93 vs. 45.4 ±3.74). Anxiety Reduction (𝑯𝟑): State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) results indicated a significant decrease in anxiety for the study group. Post-intervention, study group state anxiety dropped (39.86 ±6.06) compared to the control group (42.76 ±8.17). Furthermore, severe anxiety was eliminated in the study group (0.0 %) compared to 6.6% in the control group. Patient Outcomes (H4): The study group exhibited better clinical outcomes, specifically reduced complications and shorter hospital stays. Additionally, the intervention resulted in no readmissions and improved self-care practice & reduced anxiety levels. Conclusion: The current study showed better patients’ outcomes such as lesser complications, hospital stay, Anxiety level, with no death or readmission &with significant improvement of patients knowledge and self- care practices scores after intervention, Recommendations: Continuous enrichment of the critical ill patients’ education is vital to improves adherence to treatment, better self-care practice , reduces anxiety level as well as complications, and ultimately leads to improve patients’ outcomes. improves adherence to treatment, better self-care practice, reduces anxiety level as well as complications, and ultimately leads to improve patients’ outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SALAMA et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: