Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the efficacy of GMHEA in optimizing high-entropy alloys, indicating improved design capabilities.
(x = 1~10) and addresses key limitations of existing methods, including low search efficiency, high computational cost, and inadequate sampling of configurational space. GMHEA incorporates adaptive genetic operators (cut-and-splice pairing, soft mutation, strain mutation), structure comparison based on fingerprint, and variable-cell relaxation to ensure robust convergence to the stable structures. Comprehensive computational tests on HEAs demonstrate that GMHEA achieves a balance between accuracy and efficiency: the average computational time per atom ranges from 23.13 to 52.19 s. Structural analysis reveals that the configurations of HEAs exhibit short-range order (SRO) with optimized interatomic distances, correlating strongly with thermodynamic stability. This software provides a powerful tool for accelerating the design and development of HEAs by enabling rapid identification of stable atomic structures, with broad implications for applications in catalysis, energy storage, and advanced manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: