Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines factors influencing SNAP participation in eligible units, highlighting social food networks as vital for reducing gaps.
We link American Community Survey and SNAP records for 185,000 units with ground‐sourced social food infrastructure data from FindFoodIL (Illinois Extension SNAP‐Ed) to examine SNAP participation determinants among eligible units. Bivariate probit models reveal, beyond SNAP offices, quantity of social infrastructure is associated with participation: each additional senior program is associated with 5.89 percentage points (pp) higher participation probability, school/summer meal sites with 3.84 pp, and food pantries with 2.94 pp, potentially through trust, repeated contact, and navigation assistance. This first macro‐level quantitative evidence shows policymakers that embedding enrollment assistance within institutions already serving eligible families—schools, senior centers, food pantries—is associated with reduced SNAP participation gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lotspeich-Yadao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: