Evaluates catalytic performance in hydrogen activation and CO2 reduction using transition metal single-atom catalysts, suggesting efficient pathways for carbon capture.
Graphical abstract. Single-atom-catalyzed H 2 activation and CO 2 conversion to formic acid on BN-ixene. • TM@BN-ixene catalysts are stable, with interaction energies of −2.32 to −0.50 eV. • NBO shows 0.31−1.16 e charge transfer, confirming electropositive TM centers. • FMO shows orbital reorganization, reduced band gaps, and higher activity. • Fe@BN-ixene shows the lowest H 2 dissociation barrier of 0.37 eV. • Sc@BN-ixene favors LH CO 2 hydrogenation, yielding stable trans-formic acid. Catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to formic acid (CO 2 + H 2 → HCOOH) is a promising route for CO 2 utilization and sustainable fuel production. In this study, a series of ten transition-metal single-atom catalysts (Sc–Zn) supported on BN-ixene were systematically investigated using density functional theory to evaluate their stability, electronic properties, and catalytic performance. Interaction energy analysis confirms the strong stability of TM@BN-ixene systems, with values ranging from –2.32 to –0.20 eV. Among the studied catalysts, Sc- and Fe-decorated BN-ixene exhibit superior activity, delivering low activation barriers for hydrogen dissociation of 0.39 and 0.37 eV, respectively. Reaction energetics indicate that the formation of adsorbed atomic hydrogen (2H*) is thermodynamically favored over molecular adsorption (H 2 *), facilitating subsequent hydrogenation steps. Mechanistic analysis reveals that CO 2 hydrogenation proceeds via distinct pathways depending on the metal center, with the Langmuir–Hinshelwood (LH) pathway on Sc@BN-ixene with an activation barrier of 1.20 eV, which is slightly more favorable than the Eley–Rideal (ER) pathway on Fe@BN-ixene (1.24 eV). These findings provide critical mechanistic insights into CO 2 hydrogenation on BN-ixene-supported single-atom catalysts and highlight their potential as cost-effective and efficient platforms for carbon capture and conversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussain et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: