Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review explores maternal vaccination impact on health outcomes and global uptake disparities.
Maternal immunization has ascended as a cornerstone of contemporary strategies aimed at safeguarding pregnant women, fetuses, and children in early childhood against vaccine-preventable diseases. The profound physiological and immunological adaptations inherent to gestation heighten maternal susceptibility to infectious morbidity, while several pathogens, including influenza, pertussis, COVID-19, rubella, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), pose significant risks of adverse maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. Although an extensive body of evidence attests to the safety and effectiveness of maternal vaccines, global uptake among pregnant people remains markedly uneven and, in many settings, critically suboptimal. A nuanced understanding of national and international immunization programs, along with their structural and sociocultural challenges, is imperative to strengthen perinatal health protection. This narrative review synthesizes evidence drawn from peer-reviewed scientific literature, global health agency publications, and official national immunization guidelines. Extracted data were complemented by analyses of the immunological landscape of pregnancy, current vaccine recommendations, established safety profiles, and maternal immunization schedules across high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Particular emphasis was placed on the vaccines most consistently recommended during pregnancy, namely influenza, Tdap, COVID-19, and RSV, as well as on contextual determinants influencing vaccine hesitancy, access barriers, and global disparities in coverage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: