Randomized trial tests DISC-3405 for safety and efficacy in promoting iron restriction in healthy adults, indicating potential future use in relevant conditions.
Hepcidin is the central regulator of iron homeostasis, controlling iron sequestration and dietary iron absorption. Transmembrane serine protease 6 (TMPRSS6) suppresses hepcidin via the bone morphogenetic protein/small mothers against decapentaplegic (BMP/SMAD) pathway by cleaving the co-receptor hemojuvelin. DISC-3405 is a novel humanized monoclonal antibody that enhances hepcidin expression by inhibiting TMPRSS6, thereby promoting iron restriction. This Phase 1 study evaluated the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of DISC-3405 or placebo in 56 healthy participants. DISC-3405 (37.5 to 300 mg) or placebo was administered subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV). DISC-3405 was well tolerated. No deaths, serious adverse events, or participant discontinuations occurred. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were Grade 1 (mild) in severity, with 2 participants reporting Grade 2 (moderate) events following single dosing and no Grade 3/4 (severe/life-threatening) events reported. Median time to maximum plasma concentration was ≈96 to 168 h. Elimination half-life rose from 130 h at 37.5 mg to 265 h at 300 mg, with a clinically relevant half-life of ≈11 days. Absolute bioavailability was 39.7% (75 mg SC vs. IV). Minor accumulation occurred with repeat 4-week dosing of two doses, and PK was greater than dose proportional. DISC-3405 increased hepcidin-25 and reduced serum iron and transferrin saturation across dose levels. Single and repeated dosing of DISC-3405 produced reductions in reticulocyte hemoglobin, hemoglobin, and hematocrit. Overall, DISC-3405 was well tolerated with PK/PD data supporting further development for patients who could benefit from iron restriction, such as those with polycythemia vera.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: