Demonstrates cognitive hysteresis through persistence and adaptive recalibration across tasks, suggesting nuanced cognitive behavior understanding.
This paper demonstrates that cognitive hysteresis consists of two distinct mechanisms: persistence (state bias) and adaptive recalibration (control adjustment). Using multiple datasets (anchoring, Stroop, bandit tasks), the study shows that these mechanisms are empirically separable, statistically significant, and task-specific. Null results in unrelated paradigms confirm that the effects are not universal artifacts. The work provides a minimal, falsifiable framework for understanding how past experience shapes cognitive behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas S. Mitchell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: