Evaluates tumor color scoring system as a surrogate for biological diversity in ccRCC, suggesting potential for improved treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) exhibits marked intratumoral heterogeneity, reflected in its macroscopic color variation. As limited tissue sampling often underrepresents aggressive tumor components, macroscopic appearance may serve as an accessible, integrative indicator of intratumoral heterogeneity. However, its oncologic relevance has not been systematically investigated. This study evaluated a macroscopic color scoring system and its correlation with pathological prognostic factors and histological parameters linked to therapeutic response-related gene signatures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Macroscopic color in 309 surgically treated ccRCC cases was retrospectively analyzed and scored as 1 (golden yellow), 2 (yellow/pale tan), or 3 (grey/white). Correlations with pathological prognostic factors, histological features (cytological phenotype/vascularity-based architectural classification/immunophenotype), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: <0.001 for score 3]. CONCLUSION: Macroscopic intratumoral heterogeneity in ccRCC may offer a readily accessible surrogate for biological diversity and tumor microenvironmental features linked to therapeutic response. Systemic gross evaluation may improve tissue sampling, reduce pathological underestimation, and support personalized treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsujio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: