Why the study?
Does the proximal flow convergence method or the jet area method better quantify mitral regurgitation compared to angiography, and how does the mechanism of regurgitation affect their accuracy?
Does the proximal flow convergence method or the jet area method better quantify mitral regurgitation compared to angiography, and how does the mechanism of regurgitation affect their accuracy?
The proximal flow convergence method is superior to the jet area method for quantifying mitral regurgitation because its accuracy is not dependent on the underlying mechanism of regurgitation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preferring proximal flow convergence over jet area for MR grading irrespective of mechanism; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
In 84 patients mitral regurgitation was quantified by angiography. The mechanism of regurgitation was determined by echocardiography (organic, n = 54, functional, n = 30). The radii of the proximal isovelocity surface areas in the flow convergence region for 28 and 41 cm.s-1 blood flow velocity and the area and length of the regurgitant jet were measured using colour flow Doppler imaging. The radii of the proximal isovelocity surface areas correlated more closely with the angiographic grade than the jet parameters irrespective of the mechanism of regurgitation. In more than 90% of the patients, grades I-II mitral regurgitation were correctly differentiated from grades III-IV by means of the radii of the proximal isovelocity surface areas. Using the jet parameters, the differentiation was correct in 50-90% of the patients depending on the mechanism of regurgitation. The jet area method particularly failed to identify grades III-IV organic mitral regurgitation due to a high prevalence of eccentric jets in these patients. It is concluded that the proximal flow convergence method was suitable for the quantification of mitral regurgitation irrespective of the mechanism of mitral regurgitation. On the other hand, the value of the jet area method depended largely on the regurgitation mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Großmann et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: