PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 8, 2022Journal of Hypertension51 citations

Mechanisms for blood pressure reduction following isometric exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
JEJamie EdwardsJWJonathan D. WilesJOJamie M. O’Driscoll

Structured PICO

Does isometric exercise training reduce resting blood pressure and improve mechanistic parameters in participants?

P
Population
18 RCTs pooling 628 participants
I
Intervention
Isometric exercise training (IET) for 2-12 weeks (modes included wall squat, handgrip, and leg extension)
C
Comparator
Control (not explicitly described in abstract)
O
Outcome
Resting blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and at least one secondary mechanistic parametersurrogate

Isometric exercise training effectively lowers blood pressure, primarily through reductions in total peripheral resistance and enhanced autonomic vasomotor control, with wall squats potentially being the most effective mode.

Limitations

  • Lack of direct comparative research between different IET modes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Isometric exercise training (IET) is established as an effective antihypertensive intervention. Despite this, the physiological mechanisms driving blood pressure (BP) reductions following IET are not well understood. Therefore, we aimed to perform the first meta-analysis of the mechanistic changes measured following IET. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane library and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2000 and December 2021 reporting the effects of IET on resting BP and at least one secondary mechanistic parameter following a short-term intervention (2-12 weeks). RESULTS: Eighteen studies with a pooled sample size of 628 participants were included in the final analysis. IET produced significant reductions in resting systolic and diastolic BP of 9.35 mmHg (95% confidence interval CI = -7.80 to -10.89, P < 0.001) and 4.30 mmHg (CI = -3.01 to -5.60, P < 0.001), respectively. Mechanistically, IET produced a statistically significant reduction in resting heart rate (mean difference MD: -1.55 bpm, CI = -0.14 to -2.96, P = 0.031) and a significant increase in stroke volume (MD: 6.35 ml, CI = 0.35 to 12.60, P = 0.038), with no significant change in cardiac output. Conversely, total peripheral resistance (TPR) significantly decreased following IET (MD: -100.38 dyne s -1 cm 5 , CI = -14.16 to -186.61, P = 0.023), with significant improvements in the low frequency to high frequency heart rate variability ratio (MD: -0.41, CI = -0.09 to -0.73, P = 0.013) and baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (MD: 7.43 ms/mmHg, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates that a reduction in TPR, potentially mediated through enhanced autonomic vasomotor control, is primarily responsible for BP reductions following IET. Furthermore, this novel analysis suggests wall squat interventions to be the most effective IET mode, with clinically relevant differences in BP reductions compared to handgrip and leg extension IET; although future direct comparative research is required.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Edwards et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f53f2ae0fbb6efbd2038d4https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000003261
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper