PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 2026GeoHazards2 citationsOpen Access

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Armenia Using an Integrated Seismotectonic Framework

View Full Paper
MGMikayel GevorgyanAKArkadi KarakhanyanAAA. Arakelyan

Key Points

  • The aim is to provide an updated assessment of seismic hazards in Armenia using an integrated framework.
  • Developed a hybrid seismic source model combining fault-based and distributed seismicity.
  • Performed hazard calculations using the OpenQuake engine with a logic-tree framework.
  • Produced peak ground acceleration maps for various return periods, focusing on the 475-year return period.
  • PGA values range from approximately 0.2 g to 0.5 g across Armenia.
  • Highest hazard levels identified along the Pambak–Sevan–Syunik Fault System.
  • Seismic hazards in major cities mainly driven by shallow earthquakes with magnitudes Mw 6.8–7.4 occurring within ~30 km.

Abstract

Armenia is located within the central segment of the Arabia–Eurasia continental collision zone and is exposed to significant seismic hazard. This study presents an updated probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) for Armenia based on an integrated seismotectonic framework incorporating active fault data, paleoseismological evidence, and historical and instrumental seismicity. A hybrid seismic source model was developed by combining fault-based characteristic earthquake sources with distributed background seismicity. Hazard calculations were performed using the OpenQuake engine within a logic-tree framework to account for epistemic uncertainties in earthquake occurrence and ground-motion prediction. Ground motion was estimated using a weighted set of ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). Peak ground acceleration (PGA) hazard maps were computed for several return periods, with emphasis on the 475-year return period (10% probability of exceedance in 50 years). The results indicate PGA values across Armenia ranging from approximately 0.2 g to 0.5 g, with the highest hazard levels in northwestern Armenia along the Pambak–Sevan–Syunik Fault System. Hazard deaggregation shows that seismic hazard in major Armenian cities is primarily controlled by shallow earthquakes with magnitudes Mw 6.8–7.4 occurring within ~30 km of urban centers. The results provide a scientific basis for seismic hazard assessment, zonation, and earthquake risk mitigation in Armenia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gevorgyan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5945c71405d493afff33bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimal intensity measure for seismic performance assessment of shield tunnels in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils2024 · 64 citations
  2. 2Exploring Australian hazard map exceedance using an Atlas of historical ShakeMaps2023 · 17 citations
  3. 3Optimizing Interpolation Methods and Point Distances for Accurate Earthquake Hazard Mapping in Gas Pipeline Routing2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates?2006 · 395 citations
  5. 5Estimating slip rates and recurrence intervals for strong earthquakes along an intracontinental fault: example of the Pambak–Sevan–Sunik fault (Armenia)2001 · 104 citations