PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citations

Evaluating quality of patient-reported outcome measures in keratitis: A systematic review.

View Full Paper
HAHaile Woretaw AlemuUNSW SydneySKSheela KumaranAustralian College of OptometryNCNicole Carnt

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessing keratitis impact on quality of life.
  • Literature search conducted in databases including Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO.
  • Review included PROMs related to keratitis and extracted data on development and psychometric properties.
  • Quality assessment performed using established criteria for ophthalmic PROMs.
  • Seven articles met the inclusion criteria, with ten unique PROMs assessed, of which nine were ophthalmic and one was generic.
  • Only one PROM specifically addressing vision impairment had undergone psychometric validation, showing acceptable unidimensionality (grade B) but misfit to the Rasch model.
  • No PROMs were developed with patient input, resulting in inconsistencies between constructs and findings.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess the impact of keratitis on the quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. The review included PROMs used to assess the impact of keratitis on QoL. Data on the content development and psychometric properties were extracted. Quality assessment was performed using the established criteria for ophthalmic PROMs. RESULTS: A total of seven articles met our inclusion criteria. The study populations in the reviewed articles consist of individuals diagnosed with different types of microbial keratitis. Ten unique PROMs were reviewed. Nine were ophthalmic and one was generic. Only the impact of vision impairment PROM has undergone psychometric validation in keratitis. Although the validation indicated acceptable unidimensionality (grade B), both the eigenvalue and item-person targeting demonstrated misfit to the Rasch model. Psychometric appraisal showed that keratitis patients were not involved in PROM content development, leading to misalignment and inconsistencies between the constructs outlined by the instruments and evaluation findings. Limited available literature constrains the depth of this review. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating psychometric validation of the PROM in keratitis conditions is a good starting point. All evaluated PROMs lack psychometric validation and are not specific to keratitis. The findings of this review underscore the need to create a psychometrically robust, keratitis-specific PROM. The systematic review registration number is CRD42023449213.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alemu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5947e71405d493afff57fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ovs2.70052
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper