Evaluates family-led robotic walking intervention impacts on children, suggesting positive social changes but logistical challenges.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, impacts, and perspectives of a family-led robotic walking intervention. MATERIALS & METHODS: percentile)) and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative interviews captured family perspectives and were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: ≤ 0.001) of goals increased. Parents described positive changes in social experiences and family interactions and difficulties with the logistics of robotic walking. CONCLUSIONS: This family-led robotic walking intervention resulted in improvements in individual goals, though families did struggle with some logistics of robotic walking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Youngblood et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: