Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Implant migration is an uncommon phenomenon defined as a change in the positional axis of a stable implant. This report describes a rare case of spontaneous macro-migration occurring during the healing phase in a site with poor bone density and evaluates its 8-year functional success. METHODS: A 53-year-old female required implant placement in the maxillary left first molar (Universal tooth #14) site with low bone density (residual bone height: 4.2-5 mm). Following sinus floor elevation using particulate bone grafting, a 4 mm × 13 mm implant was placed (insertion torque: 35 Ncm; initial implant stability quotient [ISQ]: 63). Digital image registration utilizing a rigid-body transformation algorithm was employed to quantify migration at 4 months, 8 months, and 8 years. RESULTS: Digital analysis confirmed a 12.8° mesial macro-migration within the first 4 months. Despite the shift, stability increased biologically (ISQ 63-78). A 15° angled abutment was used for prosthetic correction. At 8 years, the implant remained functionally stable with intact three-dimensional bone encapsulation on cone-beam computed tomography and minimal marginal bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous migration in low-density bone before graft maturation does not necessarily preclude successful osseointegration. Long-term stability can be achieved through prosthetic intervention. KEY POINTS: Clinical phenomenon: Spontaneous implant macro-migration can occur in low-density (Type IV) bone during the submerged healing phase, particularly when associated with immature particulate bone grafts. Diagnostic tool: Digital image registration utilizing open-source software is an effective method for clinicians to objectively quantify positional shifts and differentiate adaptive migration from pathological displacement. Treatment outcome: Dental implants undergoing significant spontaneous migration (up to 12.8°) can achieve successful osseointegration and 8-year functional stability when managed with appropriate prosthetic compensation using angled abutments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: