Critical queer autoethnography explores love ethic as a resistance against fear-based ethics in academia, suggesting alternative navigation strategies.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) use positivist/biomedical frameworks of ethics to construct a fear-based logic through discourses of risk/harm. This critical queer autoethnography explores how the fear-based logic of IRBs is experienced on an embodied and affective level by a graduate student navigating sexually precarious ethical situations in the field. Using Black feminist thought and queer of color critique, I reflect on bell hooks’s “love ethic” as a queer strategy to subvert this fear-based logic and transgress the academy by leaning into the messiness of ethnography. Doing so, I introduce “academic dissimulation” as a performative resistance tactic for navigating institutional constraints of IRBs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacob W. Richardson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: