Qualitative synthesis reveals policy directions to enhance cancer care access and innovation in Brazil, indicating necessity for stronger healthcare integration.
in Brazilian Portuguese), held in Brazil in May 2025. The meeting convened 20 speakers from industry, research organizations, clinical investigators, public and private research centers, patient advocacy groups, civil society, and health policy. Discussions were organized through plenary sessions and thematic working groups. A qualitative synthesis was conducted after the meeting to identify convergent policy directions and areas of divergence. Key challenges identified during the deliberative process included regulatory predictability, taxation and importation of research supplies, mandatory post-trial access, underutilization of SUS, workforce constraints, logistical bottlenecks, regional inequities, and limited public trust. Convergent policy directions discussed by participants emphasized effective secondary regulation of Law No. 14.874/2024, digital transformation, stronger integration of clinical research within SUS, workforce professionalization, patient-centered trial designs, and differentiated approaches for rare diseases and priority populations. Strengthening Brazil's clinical research ecosystem was described by participants as requiring coordinated policy action, transparent governance, and sustained investment. The policy directions synthesized here, derived from multistakeholder deliberation, are intended to inform regulatory development and institutional strategies rather than to serve as a formal consensus statement or implementation plan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maluf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: