PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20261 citations

From wilderness to cohabitation: Literature review on human presence in environmental ethics.

View Full Paper
TKTeea KortetmäkiUniversity of JyväskyläGCGonzalo Cortés‐CapanoUniversity of Kassel

Key Points

  • The review aims to explore how environmental ethics defines human presence and impacts within various ecosystems.
  • Conducted a narrative review of environmental ethics literature.
  • Identified four main narratives: wilderness, rural stewardship, urban cohabitation, and relational narratives.
  • Synthesized findings to provide conceptual tools for sustainability practitioners.
  • Identified narratives offering frameworks for understanding human and nonhuman coexistence.
  • Highlighted limited engagement with ethical implications in land-use decisions.
  • Provided insights for policymakers on contested landscape visions.

Abstract

Land use and biodiversity conservation are increasingly recognized as ethical and value-laden topics rather than merely ecological or socio-technical problems. While this has increased multidisciplinary and participatory approaches in research, explicit engagement with environmental ethics, where those questions are scrutinized though an ethical lens, remains limited. To address this need, we reviewed how the environmental ethics literature defines and characterizes active human presence across different environments, how it frames human impacts on nonhumans, and the assumptions and normative implications articulated by these perspectives. Using a narrative approach, we identify four main narratives from environmental ethics on human and nonhuman coexistence: wilderness, rural stewardship, urban cohabitation, and relational narratives. By synthesizing these narratives, our findings offer conceptual tools that can support sustainability researchers, practitioners, and policymakers reflect more critically on the ethical dimensions of land-use decisions and better navigate contested visions of desirable landscape futures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kortetmäki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f594fc71405d493afffeechttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02377-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ecotheology, Philosophy, and Literary Narratives: Crossroads of Environmental Ethics2025
  2. 2Living with Wildlife: How Relational Values and Care Ethics Shape Conservation Action2025
  3. 3Rethinking the Relationship of Man and Wild: A Call for Wildlife Ethics2025
  4. 4Peopled landscapes: Questions of coexistence in invasive plant management and rewilding2024 · 21 citations
  5. 5Conducting ethical humanities research in rural contexts: a critical analysis of narrative reflections2026