Why the study?
Does multiple electrode aggregometry correlate and agree with single electrode aggregometry for detecting high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients on antiplatelet therapy?
Does multiple electrode aggregometry correlate and agree with single electrode aggregometry for detecting high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients on antiplatelet therapy?
Single and multiple electrode aggregometry demonstrate good correlation and agreement for detecting high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients receiving ASA and/or thienopyridine therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SEA-MEA correlations support assay interchangeability for HPR; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter antiplatelet monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: Several platelet function test systems exist for the evaluation of the platelet inhibitory effect in patients on P2Y12 inhibitors and/or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) therapy. Studies comparing different available assays found only a poor correlation. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between single electrode (SEA) and multiple electrode (MEA) aggregometry. METHODS AND RESULTS: In whole blood arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was measured simultaneously using SEA (Chrono-Log) and MEA (Multiplate). We analyzed a total of 226 measurements taken from 58 patients on single ASA therapy or dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and a thienopyridine. A cut-off value for clopidogrel/prasugrel high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) of > 47 units (U) was chosen for MEA testing using hirudin and > 5 Ohm for SEA with citrate anticoagulated blood samples. The respective cut-off values for ASA HPR were > 30 U for the MEA assay and > 1 Ohm for SEA testing. There was a good correlation of the prevalence of thienopyridine-HPR in both whole blood assays (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r = 0.698) and a good inter-rate accordance (Cohen's Kappa statistic κ = 0.648). For AA-induced aggregation, the correlation of the results obtained was significant (r = 0.536; p < 0.001) and detecting ASA-HPR revealed a moderate (κ = 0.482) correlation between both impedance aggregometry assays. CONCLUSION: Platelet function testing using SEA and MEA provided both good accordance and correlation and therefore study results obtained by these two assays similarly enabled the detection of HPR of thienopyridine (and ASA) therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krüger et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: